Frequent releases
When the team regularly ships new functionality and wants security assessment closer to product development.
Reduce security risk throughout product development, not only once a year. We regularly review new releases, API changes, infrastructure or code in line with your team's work rhythm.
When the team regularly ships new functionality and wants security assessment closer to product development.
When APIs, mobile app flows, third-party integrations, roles or access logic change.
When the team needs regular security involvement but does not yet need a full-time security engineer.
When risks need to be reduced gradually, priorities managed and a clear security action plan maintained.
New endpoints, user roles, authorization, sessions, files, payments and sensitive product flows.
Pull request, release or agreed code-area review based on risk and the team's work rhythm.
Public services, domains, IPs, cloud configuration and newly introduced infrastructure risks.
Validation of important fixes and tracking risk reduction progress over time.
Regular security involvement for smaller teams.
For actively developed products and regular releases.
For a larger attack surface and deeper security involvement.
* The plan starts immediately after the agreement is signed. After payment is received, we will prepare the agreement within 1-2 business days.
Define model
Agree cadence
Review changes
Deliver findings
Discuss priorities
We agree whether the engagement focuses on pentesting, source code review, infrastructure, releases or a combination of areas.
We define monthly hours, communication channel, access, review frequency and which changes fall into scope.
We assess new functionality, API changes, pull requests, infrastructure changes or attack surface based on the agreed model.
You receive clear findings, priorities, risk context and practical recommendations for the technical team.
With the CTO or tech lead, we discuss the most important actions, remediation progress, retesting and next-cycle focus.
A short view of what was reviewed during the cycle, which risks matter most and what changed.
Risks are presented by real impact on the product, users, data and business process.
Recommendations focus on clear actions in code, configuration, architecture or process.
We help assess risks when they appear, not only after a long time gap.
Priorities, fixes, retesting and the next security focus are discussed regularly.
After remediation, important issues can be retested to confirm risk was reduced.
A one-off test assesses one point in time. Continuous security review runs regularly alongside product changes, so risks are found closer to when they appear.
Yes. You can choose web/API testing only, source code review only, infrastructure only or a combination based on team needs.
For a small team, 8 hours per month is often enough for periodic review. An actively developed SaaS or API product often fits 16 hours, while larger attack surfaces or frequent releases are scoped at 32+ hours.
Yes. The result can be a findings list, short risk summary, team recommendations, retest conclusion or next-cycle priorities.
Send a short note about your product, team and release cadence. We will suggest the most suitable continuous security review model.